Known as a Habeas Corpus, this presents the legal reasons why Edward deserves a new trial. The outline is below.
HABEAS CORPUS OUTLINE
Ground One – Ineffective Assistance of Trial Counsel
Failure to object to inadmissible prior conviction (Rule 609(b))
Failure to present mitigating evidence at sentencing
Failure to act on late disclosure of Facebook messages
Incorrect advice on probation eligibility and sentencing options
Failure to pursue plea negotiation or judicial consideration
Failure to investigate alternate suspect (Geoffrey Jackson)
Failure to cross-examine and impeach key witnesses
Resulting cumulative prejudice
Ground Two – Prosecutorial Misconduct & Due Process Violations
Late disclosure of Facebook messages
Admission of unauthenticated electronic evidence
Burden-shifting regarding authenticity
Misleading presentation of prior conviction at sentencing
Ground Three – Ineffective Assistance of Appellate Counsel
Failure to challenge false factual finding adopted on appeal
Failure to address contradictory stance on Facebook messages’ importance
Failure to raise preserved constitutional burden-shifting error
Ground Four – Improper Grand-Jury Presentation
Misleading use of prior conviction label before grand jury
Request for in-camera review of grand-jury materials
V. Cumulative Effect of Errors & Misleading Effect of Prior-Offense Label
Combined prejudicial impact under Ex parte Flores
Influence of “sexual assault of a child” label across proceedings
VI. Exhibits A-Z VII. Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law
A. Findings of Fact (recitation of key factual determinations)
B. Conclusions of Law tied to each ground for relief
C. Recommendation for relief